Osteo Science Foundation 2022 Meeting, “Regenerative Solutions to Common Problems”
Osteo Science Foundation
Join us for a two day event in Austin, Texas to hear experts in regenerative medicine discuss, Regenerative Solutions to Common Problems
More info: https://www.osteoscience.org/education/educational-events/meeting-austin-2022/
Filter displayed posters (14 keywords)
▼ Eastern Back to top
A Fibrin Hydrogel Encapsulated with Gingival-Derived MSC Extracellular Vesicle-Laden Small Intestine Submucosa Construct Promotes Tongue Myomucosal Regeneration in Rats
Puhan He, DMD; Qilin Xu, DMD, PhD; Qunzhou Zhang, PhD; Rabie M. Shanti, DMD, MD; Anh D. Le, DDS, PhD;
Mandibular Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis to Achieve Adequate Vertical Bone for Implant Placement
Eric Silver, DMD, MD
The Recurrence Risk of Oropharyngeal Malignancies with Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy of Osteoradionecrosis: a Systematic Review
Pooyan Sadr Eshkevari
Materials and Methods: PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews was followed. Google scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were searched. PICOS: (P) oropharyngeal cancer post radiation, (I) HBO therapy, (C) no HBO therapy control or no control (historical control or expected recurrence rate for the involved tumor), (O) tumor recurrence (metastasis an/or local recurrence), (S) controlled trials, cohorts, series. Duplicates were removed in EndNote, and abstract exclusion was done in Rayyan. 12 records met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Trials: a total of 168 patients were assessed, 78 of which received HBO and 90 served as control. One study recruited patients requiring dental extractions or implant placement in the mandible with prior radiation therapy >50 Gy (53 non-HBO/47 HBO). Recurrence was seen in 6 controls (11%) and 7 HBO patients (15%) without statistical significance. The other trial recruited patients with established ORN and enrolled a total of 68 patients (37 in non-HBO/31 in HBO). A total of 2 recurrences were observed. Cohorts: from 1979 to 2017, these cohorts included 327 non-HBO and 317 HBO patients and the recurrence rate ranged from 0-2. Series: 4 refuting recurrence and 1 supporting it (reporting undiagnosed cancer was misdiagnosed as ORN).
Conclusion: The inconsistency of included RCTs in terms of indication of HBO may not allow pooling of the data for a systematic review. This is however worth exploration for the cohorts and case-series if needed with caution to adjust for the use or not of surgery and/or medication therapy, follow-up length and other associated factors. Majority of the literature consistently refutes potential increase in recurrent rate because of HBO. This needs to be further studied.
SCAFFOLD-FREE FACIAL NERVE CONDUIT ENGINEERED USING DENTAL PULP STEM CELLS
Matthew Dailey DDS, MD; Michelle Drewry, MS; Kristi Rothermund BS, HTL (ASCP); Fatima Syed-Picard MSE, PhD
Innervated Bioengineered Salivary Gland to Model SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity
Caitlynn M. L. Barrows, Danielle Wu, Robert Witt, Laura Smith Callahan, Simon Young, Mary C. Farach-Carson
Does Bone Grafting Increase Primary Stability of Dental Implants Placed in Sites of Previous Failure?
Brian R Carr DMD, Timothy W Neal DDS, Richard Finn DDS
Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate dental implants placed between 2015 and 2016 at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System in Dallas. The primary predictor variable was placement of a bone graft (1cc of MinerOss; manufactured by Collagen Matrix, Inc., Oakland, NJ) at the time of explantation due to implant movement/failure. The primary outcome variable was primary stability at the time of reimplantation, defined as resistance of the implant to rotational forces, measured as insertional torque to the lowest Ncm which stopped the implant motor from further advancing the implant and the next 10 Ncm value not achieved ( ie , >30 Ncm, <40 Ncm). All implants were placed after six months from the time of explantation. A secondary outcome variable was early implant failure, defined as implant exfoliation noted by the patient or failure due to implant movement or pain necessitating explantation prior to prosthesis loading. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with p<0.05 used to determine statistical significance.
Results One hundred and three patients had 214 implants placed. Of the 214 implants placed, eight were placed in sites of previous failure. Five of the eight implants were placed in sites that were bone grafted at the time of explantation, while three of the implants were placed in sites that were not bone grafted. The mean insertional torque value at reimplantation for bone grafted sites was higher than sites that were not bone grafted (40-49 Ncm versus 30-39 Ncm), but this was not statistically significant (Student’s t-test, p=0.174).
Subgroup analysis found that the bone grafting group had one early failure (20%), and the non-bone grafting group had one early failure (33%). There was no significant difference between bone grafting at the time of explantation and the incidence of early failures after reimplantation (OR 0.500; 95% CL 0.02-12.90, p=1).
Discussion The results of this preliminary study suggest there is no association between bone grafting at the time of explantation and primary stability as determined by insertional torque values of dental Implants placed in sites of previous failure. Subgroup analysis showed bone grafting at the time of explantation was not associated with protection against subsequent early failure.